Est. 2026 · Iffeldorf, Bavaria Free · No sign-up · 100% in-browser EN · DE
Passive Voice Fixer

The copy desk for active prose


The Guide

Passive voice, explained.


Passive voice is the most argued-about, least understood habit in English writing. This page explains what it actually is, how to spot it in two seconds, why it creeps into drafts, and — importantly — when it is the right choice. It is the manual behind the Fixer.

What passive voice is

Every sentence with a transitive verb has three seats: a doer, an action, and a receiver. Active voice seats them in that order. Passive voice promotes the receiver to the front and demotes the doer — or drops them entirely:

Active: The board reviewed the report.
Passive: The report was reviewed (by the board).

The recipe is always the same:

form of to be (am, is, are, was, were, be, been, being)  +  past participle (written, made, taken, reviewed …)
Colloquially, get stands in for be: “the window got broken.”

The two-second test

If you can add “by zombies” right after the verb and the sentence still makes grammatical sense, it's passive:

  • “The report was reviewed by zombies.” ✓ passive
  • “The board reviewed by zombies the report.” ✗ active

A caution: not everything that looks like the recipe is passive. “She was tired” uses tired as an adjective — a state, not an action. That's why the Fixer marks such cases as possible rather than pretending certainty.

Why drafts fill up with it

  • It feels safer. “Mistakes were made” assigns no blame. That's exactly why readers distrust it.
  • It sounds formal. Many of us were taught that officialese equals professionalism. It mostly equals fog.
  • The doer is genuinely unclear in early drafts — passive lets you postpone deciding who's responsible. Fine for drafting; fix it before shipping.

Before and after — from the ledger

Passive (before)Active (after)
The meeting was scheduled by my assistant.My assistant scheduled the meeting.
Your request is being processed.We're processing your request.
The bug was fixed in version 2.1.We fixed the bug in version 2.1.
A decision has been made.We've decided.
The invoice will be sent on Friday.We'll send the invoice on Friday.
It was agreed that the deadline would be moved.Both teams agreed to move the deadline.
The results were analyzed and a pattern was found.The researchers analyzed the results and found a pattern.
New features are being added every week.We add new features every week.
He was given a final warning.The referee gave him a final warning.
Lessons were learned.We learned our lesson.
Applications must be submitted by Friday.Submit your application by Friday.
The cake was eaten before the guests arrived.Someone ate the cake before the guests arrived.
It is believed that prices will rise.Analysts believe prices will rise.
The proposal was rejected by the committee.The committee rejected the proposal.

Notice two recurring moves: name the doer (“we”, “the committee”), or — for instructions — switch to the imperative (“Submit your application”), which is the most active voice of all.

When passive is the right call

Passive voice is a tool, not a sin. Keep it when:

  1. The doer is unknown. “My bike was stolen last night.” You'd name the thief if you could.
  2. The doer is obvious or irrelevant. “The suspect was arrested.” Everyone knows the police did it; naming them adds nothing.
  3. The receiver is the story. If a paragraph is about the cathedral, “the cathedral was completed in 1248” keeps the camera where the reader is looking.
  4. Process and science writing. “The sample was heated to 90 °C.” Lab convention prefers the procedure over the technician — most journals accept either, but the passive here is idiomatic, not evasive.
  5. Deliberate diplomacy. “The invoice hasn't been paid yet” can open a negotiation more gently than “you haven't paid.” Use sparingly — readers can smell it.

How the Fixer decides

Transparency is house policy, so here is the whole trick — no server, just rules in your browser:

  • It splits your text into sentences (it knows about “Dr.”, “e.g.”, decimals, and quotes).
  • It looks for the recipe: be/get + optional adverbs + past participle, using a list of ~180 irregular participles plus an -ed heuristic.
  • Constructions that often describe states (tired, interested, closed, married …) are marked possible instead of passive — unless a “by …” phrase proves an agent, which upgrades the verdict.
  • Words that merely end in -ed (sacred, wicked, talented) and verbs that can't take a passive (come, fallen, happened) are excluded.
  • When it can see the doer, it drafts the flip for you. The suggestions are starters, not gospel — you're the writer.
  • German texts are detected automatically and checked by a separate German engine (Beta) — werden-Passiv and Zustandspassiv. There's a full German version of the desk.

Take it for a spin →

Frequently asked

Is passive voice grammatically incorrect?

No — it's fully grammatical English and always has been. It becomes a style problem when it's your default rather than your choice, because it hides responsibility and adds words.

What passive rate should I aim for?

Editors' rule of thumb: under ~10% of sentences for business and web copy, close to 0% for calls to action, more freely in scientific or legal prose. The Fixer's verdict chip uses similar thresholds: under 5% reads as clean, above 15% as a heavy edit.

Does fixing passive voice help SEO and conversion?

Indirectly, yes. Active sentences are shorter and clearer, which improves readability scores, dwell time, and the odds a reader actually does the thing your call to action asks. No search engine penalizes passive voice itself.